As much as Chris Johnson brags about his alpha LTU deployment, you would think 
it would be in production already.


________________________________
From: AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Kurt Fankhauser 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP Airfiber or LTU

*forums and * fail for the previous post

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:46 PM Kurt Fankhauser 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Josh,

UBNT is saying in the forms that the problem with ethernet jacks has been taken 
care of. 
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-LTU/AF5XHD-ethernet-port-vs-AF5X-ethernet-port/td-p/2562992

I know its still loose on the HD but have you had any links fair in production 
on the HD because of those problem?

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM Mathew Howard 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yeah, I can't see any difference in the ethernet ports, so I assumed they'll 
still have the same problems. I haven't actually seen any problems with the 
ethernet on an AF5XHD yet... but it doesn't always happen on the old radios 
either, so that doesn't prove much. They also have the advantage that of a 
usable second ethernet port, so you can hook up both and hope at least one 
keeps working.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:50 PM Adam Moffett 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I didn't have any problem installing the boots or plugging or unplugging a 
cable with the boot installed.
The AF5XHD is good for the money.  I can't complain.  The only thing I'd be 
ware of is you really want a super hot CINR to hit the high data rates that 
they advertise.

We just used an AF5XHD with 34dbi dishes to replace an ePMP with their 25dbi 
dishes.  On the exact same channel the ePMP was on, the AF5XHD didn't actually 
give us better throughput.  We did end up getting more than double the speed 
after shuffling channels around to reduce interference.  It's unfortunately 
still only getting 64QAM (4x) in one direction due to interference, but it's 
1024QAM (10x) in the other direction.

On 11/16/2018 3:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Who said that?  It's the exact same problem, it's so damn loose.  Yes, you 
still have to force that cable up there for it to work.

They did include a rubber IP67 boot.  If you put this inside and try to put a 
cat5/rj45 in there you'll destroy the female jack of the radio.  I would guess 
if you slid the rubber thing over the cat5, plugged it in, and kept that boot 
in there it would help it from coming down at all but the trade there is a new 
tech will destroy the radio more often than what the boot would help...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Kurt Fankhauser 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Josh,

I thought they fixed the Ethernet jack on the AF5XHD? That is what UBNT is 
telling me they said they found a problem vendor. Are you still having issues 
where you have to push the RJ45 up into the AF to get the ethernet link to come 
back?

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Josh Luthman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
AF5Xhd is pretty sweet.  I'm happier radio wise than the AF5X.  It's still a 
shit ethernet jack.

As to ptmp, the snmp seems to be built with that in mind.  As to when it'll 
come, all I can say is I've heard questions with no answer.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne 
St<https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
Suite 
1337<https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
Troy, OH 
45373<https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Joe Novak 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We have been using the AF5XHD as well. I'm happy with it as a PTP platform, but 
in a lot of our areas we are running 2 foot dishes for even the shorter hops to 
achieve the SNR for 1024QAM. It's kicking ass though, and these links probably 
should have been bigger dishes to begin with so it is what it is.

Highlights are mostly that now 256Q(8x) has a effective output power of 
21db-22db, compared to the 18db on a good day of the original 5X. I think 1024Q 
(10x) is now more like 18db-19db now which is a huge improvement compared to 
the original 5X. It has helped quite a few of the links we have replaced.

Joe

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:19 PM Timothy Steele 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
AirFiberxHD (PTP LTU) has been working awesome at least 2 times the throughput 
and uses a lot less power then AirfiberX

grate for solar sites



On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sean Heskett 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Who cares, Ubiquiti likes to sue their customers so why would anyone wanna buy 
their crap?!?!

-Sean


On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paul McCall 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Has anyone heard any update on when the PTMP Airfiber or other UBNT LTU gear is 
coming?

It seems like the fodder / vaporware cycle on this has been running long then 
normal

Paul
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to