Sorry, didn't see that. "Unrelated" to my issue with the rj45 sitting in the ethernet jack. You can buy an HD today or come down to my office and I'll show you brand new ones where the rj45 is as loose as a....well you know.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > Josh, did you see my previous post? I answered your question. > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:22 AM Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> [image: Image] >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, November 19, 2018 8:15 AM >> *To:* AFMUG >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP Airfiber or LTU >> >> Companies spoke highly of the beam steering products, too. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0ASuite+1337+%0D%0ATroy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:04 AM Craig Schmaderer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> As much as Chris Johnson brags about his alpha LTU deployment, you would >>> think it would be in production already. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Kurt Fankhauser < >>> [email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:48 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP Airfiber or LTU >>> >>> *forums and * fail for the previous post >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:46 PM Kurt Fankhauser < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Josh, >>>> >>>> UBNT is saying in the forms that the problem with ethernet jacks has >>>> been taken care of. https://community.ubnt.com >>>> /t5/airFiber-LTU/AF5XHD-ethernet-port-vs-AF5X-ethernet-port/ >>>> td-p/2562992 >>>> >>>> I know its still loose on the HD but have you had any links fair in >>>> production on the HD because of those problem? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah, I can't see any difference in the ethernet ports, so I assumed >>>>> they'll still have the same problems. I haven't actually seen any problems >>>>> with the ethernet on an AF5XHD yet... but it doesn't always happen on the >>>>> old radios either, so that doesn't prove much. They also have the >>>>> advantage >>>>> that of a usable second ethernet port, so you can hook up both and hope at >>>>> least one keeps working. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:50 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I didn't have any problem installing the boots or plugging or >>>>>> unplugging a cable with the boot installed. >>>>>> The AF5XHD is good for the money. I can't complain. The only thing >>>>>> I'd be ware of is you really want a super hot CINR to hit the high data >>>>>> rates that they advertise. >>>>>> >>>>>> We just used an AF5XHD with 34dbi dishes to replace an ePMP with >>>>>> their 25dbi dishes. On the exact same channel the ePMP was on, the >>>>>> AF5XHD >>>>>> didn't actually give us better throughput. We did end up getting more >>>>>> than >>>>>> double the speed after shuffling channels around to reduce interference. >>>>>> It's unfortunately still only getting 64QAM (4x) in one direction due to >>>>>> interference, but it's 1024QAM (10x) in the other direction. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/16/2018 3:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Who said that? It's the exact same problem, it's so damn loose. >>>>>> Yes, you still have to force that cable up there for it to work. >>>>>> >>>>>> They did include a rubber IP67 boot. If you put this inside and try >>>>>> to put a cat5/rj45 in there you'll destroy the female jack of the radio. >>>>>> I >>>>>> would guess if you slid the rubber thing over the cat5, plugged it in, >>>>>> and >>>>>> kept that boot in there it would help it from coming down at all but the >>>>>> trade there is a new tech will destroy the radio more often than what the >>>>>> boot would help... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0ASuite+1337+%0D%0ATroy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought they fixed the Ethernet jack on the AF5XHD? That is what >>>>>>> UBNT is telling me they said they found a problem vendor. Are you still >>>>>>> having issues where you have to push the RJ45 up into the AF to get the >>>>>>> ethernet link to come back? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Josh Luthman < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> AF5Xhd is pretty sweet. I'm happier radio wise than the AF5X. >>>>>>>> It's still a shit ethernet jack. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As to ptmp, the snmp seems to be built with that in mind. As to >>>>>>>> when it'll come, all I can say is I've heard questions with no answer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have been using the AF5XHD as well. I'm happy with it as a PTP >>>>>>>>> platform, but in a lot of our areas we are running 2 foot dishes for >>>>>>>>> even >>>>>>>>> the shorter hops to achieve the SNR for 1024QAM. It's kicking ass >>>>>>>>> though, >>>>>>>>> and these links probably should have been bigger dishes to begin with >>>>>>>>> so it >>>>>>>>> is what it is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Highlights are mostly that now 256Q(8x) has a effective output >>>>>>>>> power of 21db-22db, compared to the 18db on a good day of the >>>>>>>>> original 5X. >>>>>>>>> I think 1024Q (10x) is now more like 18db-19db now which is a huge >>>>>>>>> improvement compared to the original 5X. It has helped quite a few of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> links we have replaced. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joe >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:19 PM Timothy Steele < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> AirFiberxHD (PTP LTU) has been working awesome at least 2 times >>>>>>>>>> the throughput and uses a lot less power then AirfiberX >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> grate for solar sites >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who cares, Ubiquiti likes to sue their customers so why would >>>>>>>>>>> anyone wanna buy their crap?!?! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Sean >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paul McCall <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone heard any update on when the PTMP Airfiber or other >>>>>>>>>>>> UBNT LTU gear is coming? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It seems like the fodder / vaporware cycle on this has been >>>>>>>>>>>> running long then normal >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
