I do t believe it is. First one to the customer with reasonable service levels 
and customer service and prices wins. 

> On Feb 9, 2019, at 6:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Well, is it? Did AT&T beat Google to many of the homes?
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 5:02:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville
> 
> This an exception to that rule.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Feb 9, 2019, at 1:46 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>  
> so is it safe to now assume "the first one with fiber" does not necessarily 
> still win?
>  
> obviously ATT got there first so i guess they won....
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Colin Stanners
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville
> 
> Microfiber works for cheaper/faster/temporary runs or as you said on private, 
> controlled property. 
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 12:24 PM Bill Prince <[email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> I think microfiber can work it is for the end-user hookup, and (probably) 
>> entirely on their property. However, for a main line, or even a trunk, it 
>> sounds like it's maybe just a bit too cheap.
>> 
>> --
>> bp
>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:15 AM Matt Hoppes 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I thought the whole issue of 2” deep was brought up when it started and was 
>>> determined and said to be a non issue. 
>>> 
>>> Either because no one would bother it or they would just rerun. 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 9, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So here's why Google Fiber failed.
>>> 
>>> 1.  Microtrenches were done as little as 2" in some areas.  When roads got 
>>> resurfaced, they ate up Google Fiber.  Additionally, you could go down a 
>>> road and see foam coming up in some areas.  Google Fiber contractors were 
>>> not what I'd call first rate.  They were being pressured by the local 
>>> project manager to get things completed fast.  Anyone in construction knows 
>>> that means quality can go to shit.
>>> 2.  Anytime a permit was pulled for Google Fiber microtrenching, AT&T owned 
>>> the poles, so they deployed fiber within 2 weeks of a permit.  The work 
>>> usually didn't commence for a month and by that time, AT&T had went through 
>>> and signed up a bunch of customers.  So Google Fiber take rate was not very 
>>> high as AT&T built faster than them.  AT&T project managers were given an 
>>> "unlimited" budget to beat Google Fiber on every project.  Spectrum would 
>>> also upgrade those same areas to latest DOCSIS technology to deploy gigabit 
>>> speeds as well.
>>> 3.  Lots of promises and not a lot delivered.  They know the plant does not 
>>> have a long term life and don't feel like fixing things.  So now the city 
>>> has to deal with it for the time to come.
>>> 
>>> That sad part is that a lot of my friends have it where it is available to 
>>> them.  They like it a lot and don't want to go back to AT&T/Spectrum.
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 12:20 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Sure enough. But if it doesn't get USA attention, you may be doing a lot 
>>>> of repairs. Sounds like that's what Google discovered.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> bp
>>>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:15 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> I recently got a quote from a contractor for microtrenching.  $12/foot 
>>>>> asphalt repair, duct and handholes included.  Cheaper than boring. 
>>>>>  
>>>>> From: Colin Stanners
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2019 10:01 AM
>>>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville
>>>>>  
>>>>> From the article: The tech giant acknowledged problems in Louisville with 
>>>>> a new method of digging shallower trenches to speed up the installation 
>>>>> times of the fiber optic cable. Google says the problems were "disruptive 
>>>>> to residents and caused service issues for our customers."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sounds like they tried microtrenching and then discovered its 
>>>>> limitations, or how little city/construction crews worry about hitting 
>>>>> fiber when it's at pretty much street level/directly in their work area.
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> And an unlimited supply of money does not help.  Slow and careful on a 
>>>>>> limited budget does work.  Many on this list can prove it. 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> From: Bill Prince
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2019 9:38 AM
>>>>>> To: AFMUG
>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Yet another confirmation that it's not as easy as it looks.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> https://finance.yahoo.com/news/googles-high-speed-internet-pulling-220020962.html
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> bp
>>>>>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>> Chuck
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to