Are you seriously telling me I have to get a fax machine? Making them SMS a picture of the check isn’t a horrible idea. Probably need to think about the security implications a bit.
Mark > On Jan 16, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe that is why some payees insist that you mail or FAX them a voided check > before they accept ACH payments from you. > > From: Mark Radabaugh <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 7:12 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Auditing IPpay > > What really pisses me off is the lusers that figure out that a EFT > transaction always authorizes then bounces a couple of days later, so they > give you a bogus account to get service turned back on until the check > bounces. The bank doesn’t charge them because they made up the account in > the first place, but we still get the $10 fee from the bank. Not only did > they not pay the bill, they cost us fees. > > There is a whole list of people we won’t accept EFT’s from anymore. > > Mark > > > >> On Jan 15, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> That may be the case, but there's no way I could really begin to track that. >> We do card transactions daily. If I try to compare Powercode's transaction >> list to Chase my eyes would get dizzy, especially if you throw in delayed >> transactions from some days. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> You may have a couple cards that took longer to settle too. I'd check again >>> tomorrow or Monday and see if the money shows up. The vast majority of >>> time, we see funding in 48hrs, but sometimes it is longer. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> We do minimal ACH, but I definitely appreciate the heads up =) >>>> >>>> We get (or at least used to...) an email when an NSF happens. Haven't >>>> seen that in quite some time, but we also quit doing ACH and probably have >>>> 3-5 customers using it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> One thing you might check is make sure the ACH charges actually went >>>>> through if you have them. IPPay will get an approval from the bank and >>>>> give your system the approval, but if the funds are NSF on the day they >>>>> draw the transaction will reverse. There is no mechanism for IPPay to >>>>> report that via their API so it is up to the end user to check their >>>>> IPPay report. Just an idea. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> That’s around what I was told and am expecting. >>>>>> >>>>>> I’ll have to check the numbers again to make sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On >>>>>> Behalf Of Josh Luthman >>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:38 AM >>>>>> >>>>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Auditing IPpay >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've done fees/total charge and it was 1.99-2.01% I believe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>> Yes, I see that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I should be able to audit what Platypus/IPPay says was charged, with >>>>>>> what goes into the bank account directly. >>>>>>> There are functions for doing that within Platypus, I just haven’t used >>>>>>> them in years J >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe I’m not so concerned about that as much as I’m wondering if the >>>>>>> IPPay fees, and merchant fees are on par with the rate I think I’m >>>>>>> supposed to be getting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:26 AM >>>>>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Auditing IPpay >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Merchant fees come out as their own charge at the end of the month. >>>>>>> You should receive 100% of what you charge. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Sterling Jacobson >>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> I’m wondering the same thing for Platypus billing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At times it seems the merchant fees are a lot higher that I thought >>>>>>>> they would be looking at the raw incoming in our QuickBooks and the >>>>>>>> monthly outgoing line item for IPPay and AMEX etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] >>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 10:39 AM >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Auditing IPpay >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone do any sort of checking to make sure what you charge in >>>>>>>> billing (ie Powercode) actually shows up in your account (ie Chase)? >>>>>>>> I don't suspect anything, but the thought occurred after I saw we're >>>>>>>> short $500 today from what we charged in cards on the 13th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
