Yeah it's a real psychological phenomenon. We (humans) are terrible at intuitive risk assessment. We're worried about terrorist attacks, but not worried about our cholesterol and driving habits which are both more dangerous.

I don't see a conspiracy underneath it all though. I just see us flailing around stupidly like the dumb mammals we really are.


On 2/20/2016 12:12 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
Too bad we don't give as much attention, publicity, and funding to prevent ways that people actually die.

http://m.livescience.com/3780-odds-dying.html

Way more likely to die from heart disease, cancer or a car accident. Terrorist attack didn't even register on their list, it's lumped in with "all other"

If we could only improve car safety a little bit we would instantly save more lives then all terrorist attacks on US soil ever!

But it's way more exciting for our government to rule by fear :-/

-Sean

On Friday, February 19, 2016, Bill Prince <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    The flip side of this coin is the FBI trying this in the court of
    public opinion.

    I say it's a publicity stunt by the FBI.

    Fear Fear Fear.

    That's what they're selling these days, and I haven't been buying
    tehy b**sh*t since 9/11.

    bp
    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

    On 2/19/2016 6:58 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
    True, getting it decided in the courts is the best outcome.

    I'm still not convinced that this is anything more than a
    publicity stunt on Apples side. If Apple has the ability to
    create a way to unlock it, and they haven't said that they can't
    do it, how is that any different from them already having it? And
    why is it any better for Apple to have the ability to crack
    iPhones than the FBI? Now, I certainly don't trust the
    government, but they've pretty much always had the ability to
    look at anything and everything we have in this sort of an
    investigation.

    This is basically the equivalent of the FBI finding a safe with a
    built in safe that has a built in self destruct feature and
    telling the company that built it to disable the self destruct,
    so they can try cracking it... they aren't asking them to put a
    camera in every safe they build so that they can look inside
    whenever they want, which is what a lot of people seem to be
    making this out to be.


    On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Chuck Macenski
    <[email protected]
    <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:

        WIthout taking a public position one way or the other, this
        need to be settled in the courts so that we all have some
        idea of what rights we do or do not have; we should not be
        required to guess about what the government can and can't do;
        if we can't be trusted to know what the government can do,
        then it can be argued that we have no rights. I am reminded
        of the national security letters which are arguably
        unconstitutional, but, any attempt to present that argument
        to the judicial branch can result in your imprisonment.

        my 2 cents

        On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Brian Webster
        <[email protected]
        <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
        wrote:

            Ok I will bite to keep the thread moving.

            Ponder this thought:

            Executive branch has the ability to direct the NSA to do
            domestic spying, may not be legal but they do it anyway.
            This includes spying on members of congress.

            We know politicians all have skeletons in their closets,
            makes them ripe for extortion and such. Executive branch
            uses the NSA to gather all these bits of juicy data that
            incriminates ANY and ALL politicians.

            Every time a critical vote in congress comes up, they
            study where the swing votes may be, then all you do in
            threaten to disclose any of these juicy details the NSA
            has gathered. End result is the vote goes the way you
            need it to.

            As the executive branch you use this power and tactic
            very carefully and sparingly so as not to raise
            suspicions or to cause legislative revolt.

            The public does not worry about this because they have
            the protection of the Supreme Court and the balance of
            powers.

            Then you think, but what if the executive branch does
            this to the judges too…………………

            This level of power is something that once discovered
            would never be given up, it’s just too handy and
            powerful, no matter which party the executive may be from.

            Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

            Thank You,

            Brian Webster

            www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>

            www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
            <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>]
            *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
            *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 9:03 PM
            *To:* [email protected]
            <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Apple

            Yeah, I was being a troll when I started the thread.  I
            knew it would get some traction. Tushar was right, I was
            bored.

            *From:*Jaime Solorza
            <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>

            *Sent:*Friday, February 19, 2016 7:01 PM

            *To:*Animal Farm
            <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>

            *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] OT Apple

            Hire a high school get to open phone.  Geezh

            On Feb 19, 2016 3:45 PM, <[email protected]
            <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:

            Treason?





Reply via email to