Kind of my thoughts on the matter, better a saturated pipe than a broken
pipe

On Sep 19, 2016 10:30 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> It should accelerate the migration so you can assert more control.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, September 19, 2016 10:11:07 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cogent...
>
> This is what petrifies me about bgp. Right now, half our static allocation
> hits cogent directly, the other half doesnt, at least we don't have to
> worry about 50% directly.
> Other than dropping the cogent peer, what recourse would we have right
> now? Not that this is going to stop us from implementing bgp, little guys
> like us have no recourse for immediate mitigation, do we
>
> On Sep 19, 2016 9:56 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
>> My point is that’s a manual process.  Some people believe BGP will
>> automagically choose the best routes, when in fact it doesn’t know about
>> latency, packet loss, etc. without tweaking by a human or robot.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2016 8:21 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cogent...
>>
>>
>>
>> Not required, but typically going along with full routes is access to BGP
>> communities. You could fine-tune both what you advertise, what you accept
>> and what your upstreams pass along. You don't have to drop the peer
>> entirely if a subset of routes is working properly.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com>
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Monday, September 19, 2016 7:21:48 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cogent...
>>
>> So much for the people who believe taking full BGP routes will
>> automatically choose the best routes.  (Why does "best routes" sound like
>> something Trump would say?)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf
>> Of Seth Mattinen
>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 6:03 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cogent...
>>
>> On 9/19/16 13:48, Robert Andrews wrote:
>> > Anybody hear what's going on with Cogent..??   Lots' of packet loss on
>> > all their cross connects.  I am hearing a lot of people having
>> > problems with financial transactions ( IP CC readers ) failing and
>> connectivity
>> > to Citrix and such failing..   IS this the new world order?
>>
>>
>> They're fubar for the last 3 days for different reasons. Today it's a
>> (another?) fiber cut in LA. Had to pull routes away from Charter to get
>> traffic away from Cogent.
>>
>> ~Seth
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to