As a long time user and ongoing user of Platypus I agree with what Justin is 
saying.

Their team has always been responsive and willing to help us out on modules or 
support for any part of it.

They got me up and running on my new stuff for a very good price.

And they update often, so that column item needs to change.

I do wish they would invest some major resources into a total client/app/web 
end redo though.
It would be extremely painful to implement, but Plat is really the SQL database 
at heart with runtime modules running things.
So it would be POSSIBLE to redo the ‘front’ end of those things.



From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Thornton
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 10:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Billing system survey rehash

I take some issue with this characterization of Platypus.  While we have never 
been the flashiest or anywhere close to the best at marketing, Platypus has 
long been on a consistent development schedule with multiple releases each 
year.  We have also taken pride in the flexibility of Platypus and how it can 
bend to work with whatever tools our customers prefer and are already familiar 
with, and how the billing results can be manipulated to provide most any 
results they desire.  So when a customer comes to us asking about CDR billing, 
integrating with monitoring tools, communicating with Sandvine, provisioning 
LTE, adding line items from Dish, DirecTv, SiriusXM, etc. for a unified 
statement or whatever it might be, we don't typically need to add a new feature 
and release a new version.  We just point the customer to where their request 
can fit into our existing architecture and assist them with the configuration.

All of the billing platforms who operate in this space have their strengths and 
weaknesses and none of us are the right solution for everyone, but Platypus is 
still actively under development and here to serve those who are a good fit for 
us.  I just don't want their to be any confusion over that.


Justin Thornton
Platypus ISP Billing



On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Ivan Kohler 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On 09/16/2016 06:01 AM, Simon Westlake wrote:
There's a couple of others that are mostly billing focused (BillMax, Freeside) 
that are probably similar in functionality to Platypus (although, I will 
confess, I am not intimately familiar with them, so they could have some 
differences.)


Sorry to be late to the party.

Simon, I would respectfully say that your characterization of Freeside as 
"billing focused" or similar to Platypus/Billmax rather than a full platform is 
incorrect.  We're very much a complete platform (for example, with all of the 7 
modules you list in your blog targeting Sonar's 1.0 release).  Vlad, thanks 
very much for the kind words - we're happy to have you as part of our community 
as both a user and contributor to the codebase.
FWIW, I did some research and put together a chart with all 9 (nine!) billing 
vendors that are WISPA members.  Of course I cannot help but be biased, so take 
it with an appropriate amount of salt, but I was going for "useful information" 
rather than "useless marketing spin".  Hope it helps!

Simon, Cameron, and anyone else, your comments/input are more than welcome.

--

Ivan Kohler, President and Head Geek, Freeside Internet Services, Inc.

Open-source billing, ticketing and provisioning - http://freeside.biz/



[Freeside]<http://freeside.biz/>

[Azotel]

[Billmax]

[DirectLink Admin]

[Platypus]

[Powercode]

[Sonar]

[VISP]

[WISPMon]

WISPA member

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

WISP features

✔

✔

✖

✖

✖

✔

✔

✔

✔

CDR billing / Telco features

✔

✖

✖

✖

✖

✖

new/preliminary

✖

✖

Fiber ISP features

✔

✖

✖

✖

✖

✖

✖

✖

✔

Deployment

Hosted or Premise

Hosted

Premise

Hosted

Premise

Premise

Hosted

Hosted

Premise

Client

Web

Web

Web

Web

Windows

Web

Web

Web

Web

License

Open-source

Proprietary

Proprietary

Proprietary

Proprietary

Proprietary

Proprietary

Proprietary

Proprietary

Price

No per-customer or license charges. Can purchase implementation, support, and 
customization services.

$?/customer/month

$?/customer/month

$0.50/customer/month

100 customers free, then $0.05-$0.70/customer/month

$0.63-$1.40/customer/month

$0.50-$1.25/customer/month

$0.90-$1.30/customer/month

$0.95-$1.30/customer/month

Ongoing development

Active (new major version this year)

Active

Active

Active (new product)

Minimal

Active

Active (new product)

Active

Active (new major version last year)

Vendor size

Small

Small

Tiny

Tiny

Medium

Large

Small

Medium

Tiny

Vendor business/ownership

Billing software

Billing software (sold through distributors)

Billing and geologic software

MDU ISP (VideoDirect)

Domain names, mobile phone service (OpenSRS, Ting, Tucows)

WISP (Bertram wireless)

Billing software

Billing software, managed ISP services (call center, email/web hosting)

Billing software

Since

1998

2005 (2010 USA)

1997

2015

1996

2003

2015

1996

2010

Notable fact(s)

Mature and full-featured ISP and CDR billing. New UI, WISP mapping features and 
hosted option.

Simple hosted system for small WISPs, almost like a franchise

Old ISP system, dormant for years, revived in 2012

New system with MDU features

Barely maintained, on life support for a decade

Giant over-the-top trade show booths (compensating for something?)

Ex-Powercode team, early access discount, rapid development

Can also host your email and answer your support calls

No longer requires Adobe Flash



Reply via email to