I liked netbox, but it was still pre-release when I played with it. They
were the talk of /r/networking for awhile.

On Sep 16, 2016 10:51 AM, "Simon Westlake" <simon@sonar.software> wrote:

> Check out https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox
>
> On 9/16/2016 10:49 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>
> phpipam isnt developed anymore
> I have an idle racktables server ready for production, its ugly/sexy and
> has everything I want except that its got a learning curve I havent sobered
> up enough to get a full grasp on, but its got all the documentory and
> reporting features I want, would love it if Bertram bought it out and
> integrated it, id be so exited Id get the vapors.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Check out phpipam
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2016 10:39 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We use Powercode, they ebb and flow. Other than simon who escaped by the
>>> skin of his teeth after murdering the guy before him I think they have
>>> gladiator fights for the lead role because every time a new lead comes in
>>> the last one disappears off the face of the earth. I imagine being in the
>>> office up there looks like something out of mad max.
>>>
>>> But overall, its a satisfying product, the inventory component is
>>> absolutely useless, but the rest is pretty reliable. Customers like the
>>> feel of the portal interface, I would prefer we had the ability to
>>> manipulate it more, but I also want my own pony named Miguel.
>>> Support responsiveness is normally pretty good, occasionally it gets
>>> meh, but I think you have that with any company depending on the work load.
>>>
>>> What I do like about it, is that I dont have to know much to manage it,
>>> The server build is down to a cut and past CLI job if it needs rebuilt. It
>>> performs well in a decent VM host.
>>>
>>> It really appears they are moving away from user driven development
>>> (there used to be constant interaction) toward more of a programmed
>>> development cycle, which is good and bad, but mostly a positive move.
>>>
>>> It would be nice if they had clean IPAM, i still have a set of excel
>>> spreadsheets for master subnet documentation, but I dont think there is
>>> such a beast in IPAM that would satisfy everyone.
>>>
>>> The ticketing system became super useful once they added external email
>>> accounts, it allowed us to decommission a secondary ticketing system. Its
>>> only good for our ISP side, not our contract services side however because
>>> it doesnt offer clean time tracking or multiple tech separation
>>>
>>> My boss is very frugal when it comes to anything that generates a
>>> recurring cost, and he sees Powercode as a beneficial recurring cost, so
>>> that does say something about the product.
>>>
>>> I cuss them every couple months over something or other, its usually
>>> 50/50 whether its something I screwed up, or a bug in their system, but it
>>> always gets resolved. We have an ongoing issue with email fetching that
>>> happens, but they gave me a cli tool to resolve it, and its caused by
>>> something external and outside their control, so I cant hold it against
>>> them.
>>>
>>> There is currently no way to easily reset the tracking metrics on
>>> tickets and times, but thats no deal breaker, they will eventually clean it
>>> up.
>>>
>>> If youre looking for actual inventory management with any type of
>>> valuation, its definetly not the product. Azotel had that when we were
>>> looking into them, and I think you could tie in crystal reports to get some
>>> really amazing data, but it seems like Azotel went to sleep
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We've been running Freeside for the last 10 years. It takes a bit of
>>>> perl and linux knowledge to get it running (or just download the VM), but
>>>> hey, what do you want for nothing?
>>>>
>>>> Feature-wise, freeside is on par with the big boys these days.. Can't
>>>> think of anything it doesn't have that an ISP billing system should have.
>>>> The new version even has tower coverage mapping... very WISP-friendly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> peace
>>>>
>>>> Vlad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/16/2016 12:50 AM, TJ Trout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could I trouble you all for a quick survey / recommendation on billing
>>>>> systems?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been looking at;
>>>>>
>>>>> Power code ( seems like too many red flags with this company)
>>>>>
>>>>> Platypus ( good price, but I don't want to become a dev just to bill
>>>>> my customers)
>>>>>
>>>>> Visp seems like a decent option?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wisp Mon? Don't know much about them, prices seem high, haven't heard
>>>>> anything bad so that's a good sign?
>>>>>
>>>>> Swift fox? ( Seems like unpopular option maybe because they're new?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Sonar? Maybe that's the one?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
> --
> Simon Westlake
> Skype: Simon_Sonar
> Email: simon@sonar.software
> Phone: (702) 447-1247
> ---------------------------
> Sonar Software Inc
> The next generation of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software
>
>

Reply via email to