Also. This makes real Choice an IPTV solution not an OTT solution. 

We need a cost effective OTT solution. 

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 17:18, Keefe John <> wrote:
> Unless you're getting a short wave most long-distance layer2 connections are 
> going to be MPLS over layer3 anyways.  So how's that different than a VPN or 
> GRE tunnel?
> Keefe
>> On 2/23/2018 3:56 PM, wrote:
>> That is not by choice.  The content providers all have a different tolerance 
>> as to how their product is piped around.  RealChoice could drop it and 
>> probably ship the product over the public internet and never get caught, 
>> however they risk losing channels if they ever get caught.
>> Not sure what their current deal is, when I was working with them I was 
>> trying to get the programmers to allow content via VPN or VLAN over VPN 
>> (silly, right)  over the public internet.  Some of them were OK with it.
>> -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hoppes
>> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:46 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV
>> RealChoice would be a great option if they would drop their private line 
>> requirement.
>>> On Feb 23, 2018, at 15:39, Clint Wiley <> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I wanted to see if any of you are offering IPTV to your customers. If so, 
>>> are any of you using either RodeoTV or RealChoice TV as the wholesale 
>>> provider? Can any of you provide feedback, thoughts, experiences, etc. on 
>>> either provider?
>>> Thanks,
>>> _________________________
>>> Clint Wiley
>>> Hagerstown Fiber Internet

Reply via email to