On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Colin Geoffrey Hales via AGI
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Human science is critically dependent on consciousness.

In chapter 12 you reject the Turing test and some stronger variants as
a test for consciousness. Then you propose a test based on doing
science. In your test, a robot has to learn a rule or pattern to get a
reward. Then it is tested again in a different environment to see if
it can apply the rule that it learned. If I understand you correctly,
then passing this test implies that the robot is P-conscious.

This seems like a standard machine learning problem. I have written
such programs without the robotic capabilities in data compression
programs. A program has to learn rules of nature that describe data
about the environment. The data might be English text, an image,
audio, DNA, or some other description of a natural phenomena. A good
model will successfully predict the symbols in the description string
and demonstrate this capability by encoding them using fewer bits for
the more likely outcomes. Furthermore, it will demonstrate that it can
apply the rules that it learned to a new environment. Given two
strings x and y, it demonstrates this by C(x + y) < C(x) + C(y), where
C() is the compressed size. The compressor takes what it learned from
x and applies it to improve its ability to predict y. Most compression
algorithms will do this on many types of data.

I know you don't believe that a program like zip or rar or 7zip is
conscious. But then again, you wrote a whole book and have not been
able to define P-consciousness. You simply assert that it is necessary
to do science. I don't see how you can make an assertion without being
able to even give a precise statement of your assertion.

-- 
-- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to