-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 2017-02-13 05:43 PM, Mike Archbold wrote:
> I agree with Jim Bromer.  Partly I guess it depends how Tononi 
> defines consciousness.  I've studied it very generally, but not in 
> detail. Intuitively, he seems to have identified an essential 
> component but by no means everything....  Obviously our 
> consciousness is saturated in feedback, but just having a feedback 
> property does not make a computer conscious.  What is a more 
> complete definition under IIT?  It can't be just feedback... what
> I have seen of IIT looks interesting.
> 


"it has been pointed out that the brain (and
many other systems) is full of reentrant circuits, many of which do
not seem to contribute to consciousness [51]. IIT offers some
specific insights with respect to these issues. First, the need for
reciprocal interactions within a complex is not merely an empirical
observation, but it has theoretical validity because it is derived
directly from the phenomenological axiom of (strong) integration.
Second, (strong) integration is by no means the only requirement
for consciousness, but must be complemented by information and
exclusion. Third, for IIT it is the potential for interactions among
the parts of a complex that matters and not the actual occurrence
of ‘‘feed-back’’ or ‘‘reentrant’’ signaling, as is usually assumed. As
was discussed above, a complex can be conscious, at least
in principle, even though none of its neurons may be firing, no
feed-back or reentrant loop"  IIT3.0


Basically from my limited understanding of IIT3.0

Consciousness requires three things Information, Integration and
Exclusion.

Feedback satisfies integration, as the components have to be
interconnected.

Information implies that there are past memories which can affect
present actions, or that memories could be acquired to affect future
actions.

And Exclusion means that the consciousness has defined borders.


It would seem that it may be a bit tricky with the program switching
that happens in a modern CPU.  Though I'm fairly certain that with
FPGA's it would apply quite smoothly.  For instance after some FPGA
circuits have been set up, even if they are not active, they could
still be passively conscious, ready for input.

It may be similar if you consider things loaded in RAM or cache as
passively conscious and actively conscious when processing in CPU.
Similarly a kernel loaded in GPU would be conscious,  though I think
there would be some question as to the quality of consciousness,
whether it might be highly modular, and thus of a low phi. IF however
all the kernels are working together, via local or glboal memory, they
could be considered strongly integrated, and would be a singular
consciousness.

> On 2/13/17, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Your Central Metabolic Control System (CMCS) is clearly both 
>> intelligent and independent. It appears to have abilities 
>> approximating a PhD Control Systems Engineer, and often works at 
>> cross purposes to your conscious intentions to keep you alive
>> and healthy.
>> 
>> CMCS malfunctions often look a LOT like demonic possession.
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> On Feb 11, 2017 12:11 PM, "Dr Miles Dyson" 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> When I fall asleep and loose consciousness, the neurons in my 
>> brain do not rearrange themselves such that no feedback loops 
>> exist.  And there are many feedback loops that exist in the 
>> brain, but I don't have many consciousnesses, I have but one. For
>> both of those reasons consciousness and neural net feedback loops
>> are not one and the same thing.
>> 
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Jim Bromer 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't concur, but it is an interesting placement of the 
>>> minimum for (machine) 'consciousness'. I did not realize that 
>>> 'stateless' 'pure functions' could be called 'feed forward'.
>>> If global effects were sufficient to induce 'consciousness'
>>> then any program with global effects could be called conscious.
>>> Even assuming that you were being more specific than that I
>>> still don't think structures that can carry states between
>>> calls (in the ways that you were thinking) would be sufficient
>>> for conscious behaviors to emerge..
>>> 
>>> Jim Bromer
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Logan Streondj 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've been promoting Integrated Information Theory for a
>>>> while but I finally sat down and read the whole thing
>>>> yesterday.
>>>> 
>>>> Explicitly it mentions that feed forward neuronets are 
>>>> 'zombies' or unconscious while recurrent neuronets are 
>>>> conscious due to the feedback loops.
>>>> 
>>>> So now I'm wondering which classical programming structures 
>>>> are 'zombies' and which are conscious.
>>>> 
>>>> It would seem by analogy that stateless or pure functions
>>>> are zombies since they simply feed forward.
>>>> 
>>>> Wheras structures that carry state between calls such as 
>>>> objects and actors are conscious.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you concur?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail and 
>>>> OpenKeychain. my fingerprint is bd7e 6e2a e625 6d47 f7ed 30ec
>>>> 86d8 fc7c fad7 2729 *AGI* | Archives 
>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> 
>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5>
>>>>
>>>> 
| Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your
>>>> Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> *AGI* | Archives 
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> 
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee>
>>>
>>> 
| Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>> 
>> 
>> *AGI* | Archives 
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> 
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac>
>>
>> 
| Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: 
>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: 
>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
>>  Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; 
>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: 
> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: 
> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/5037279-a88c7a6d 
> Modify Your Subscription: 
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
eb0005
>
>
> 
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> 

- -- 
Logan Streondj,
A dream of Gaia's future.
website: http://joyfullifestyle.ca
twitter: https://twitter.com/streondj

You can use encrypted email with me,
how to: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/
key fingerprint:
BD7E 6E2A E625 6D47 F7ED 30EC 86D8 FC7C FAD7 2729
,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=BADU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to