On Feb 16, 2012 9:06 AM, "TreKing" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:05 AM, c beck <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or that they know most apps are 0.99 cents and goes and finds one of your competitors with that price. > > Of course, that assumes your competitor offers the same amount of functionality / features (or, for games, "quality") for the a lower price point. If you give the user the option of a $0.99 piece of shit that does X and a $2.99 piece of awesome that does X, Y, and Z and twice as fast, you can justify the price difference. >
And that assumes the buyer can look at two applications side by side and easily see the difference. The problem is they probably (based on my experience) skim descriptions and skip to market reviews, which are the usual crap shoot. I feel I can pretty easily filter out junk, but download statistics I see on some apps (even paid) in the market suggest otherwise for a lot of users. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > TreKing - Chicago transit tracking app for Android-powered devices > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
