2012/12/29 FreeLab - Laboratorium Wolności <[email protected]>

>
> As for bridge vs. direct translation,  I think that we should at least
> start from the bridged model. It is more elegant (in terms of
> structure) and needs less resources.


No.
Double translation will double CPU and RAM resources needed and degrade
quality.
And, installing all pairs just requires <100MB disk space anyway.



> I can imagine that the final
> translation (on demand) coul be done directly, provided respective
> pair exists.
>
> How about that?
>

You should really try out Apertium before you judge that:

http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium-Caffeine

Play around with it, get to know Apertium.

Look at http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Main_Page and especially
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Installation

Its easy to set up a translation server on Linux, if you know the
friendlica stuff, so come with your questions and problems, we are always
helpfull, also on IRC.

Ĝis!
Jacob

-- 
Jacob Nordfalk <http://profiles.google.com/jacob.nordfalk>
javabog.dk
Androidudvikler og -underviser på
IHK<http://cv.ihk.dk/diplomuddannelser/itd/vf/MAU>og
Lund&Bendsen <https://www.lundogbendsen.dk/undervisning/beskrivelse/LB1809/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to