assp-test  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Analyze shows DKIMNPAddress match as expected, but some messages still processed as spam? Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18094 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18094 K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18094 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18094 K Post
• [Assp-test] d= DKIM validation for WL/NP Addresses K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] d= DKIM validation for WL/NP Addresses Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Removing address from whitelist Scott MacLean
  • Re: [Assp-test] Removing address from whitelist Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18087 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject??? Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18085 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] No processing separate corpus?? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing separate corpus?? Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck James Moe via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck James Moe via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] No processing based on envelope K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing based on envelope Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing based on envelope K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing based on envelope K Post
• [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines? K Post
• [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature K Post
• [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18065 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18065 K Post
• [Assp-test] The recent CCchangeMSGDate changes K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] The recent CCchangeMSGDate changes Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18064 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain K Post
  • [Assp-test] [SPAM] Re: Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM] Re: Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18059 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18059 K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18059 James Brown via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18059 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Transport endpoint not connected / freeing thread failed? MK
• [Assp-test] Resend mail with different date K Post
• [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working John Wolf
  • Re: [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working John Wolf
  • Re: [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working John Wolf
  • Re: [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working John Wolf
• [Assp-test] ASSP Downloads Doug Lytle
• [Assp-test] UnknownLocalSender / SpoofedSender for non-local domain Zrin Ziborski
  • Re: [Assp-test] UnknownLocalSender / SpoofedSender for non-local domain Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] UnknownLocalSender / SpoofedSender for non-local domain Zrin Ziborski
  • Re: [Assp-test] UnknownLocalSender / SpoofedSender for non-local domain Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] UnknownLocalSender / SpoofedSender for non-local domain Zrin Ziborski
  • Re: [Assp-test] UnknownLocalSender / SpoofedSender for non-local domain Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18028 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] local user on whitelist K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] local user on whitelist K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18018 Thomas Eckardt
  • [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18018 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Daniel Miller via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
  • Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Daniel Miller via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Daniel Miller via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Daniel Miller via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] ASSP workers not terminating James Moe via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] ASSP workers not terminating Scott MacLean
• [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored? K Post
• [Assp-test] Attachments stripped: MS Compound File Binary K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Attachments stripped: MS Compound File Binary K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Attachments stripped: MS Compound File Binary Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
• [Assp-test] 18008 still giving okmail for replies due to MSGID Signatures K Post
• [Assp-test] Senderbase domains K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Senderbase domains K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Senderbase domains Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Senderbase domains K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18008 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18008 K Post
• [Assp-test] A lot of MySQL connections from assp SChani
  • Re: [Assp-test] A lot of MySQL connections from assp Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Colin Waring
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Meltdown/Spectre Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.12*Fortress* build 17362 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] ASSP version 2.6.1 build 17355 is released Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17352 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17341 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17339 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17338 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] ASSP_AFC version 4.73 is available Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Log rollovers Scott MacLean
  • Re: [Assp-test] Log rollovers Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] Log rollovers Steve Tetley
  • Re: [Assp-test] Log rollovers K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17323 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17323 usenet schani
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17323 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] SSL Want Read Scott MacLean
  • Re: [Assp-test] SSL Want Read Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] SSL Want Read Scott MacLean
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17317 Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17317 James Brown via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17317 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17310 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] dccifd for windows x64 published Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17307 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] DMARC report rejections Daniel Miller via Assp-test
  • Re: [Assp-test] DMARC report rejections Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] NoScan group K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17297 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] UserAttach template review request K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] UserAttach template review request Thomas Eckardt
  • Re: [Assp-test] UserAttach template review request K Post
• [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17289 Thomas Eckardt
• [Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions K Post
  • Re: [Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions Thomas Eckardt
  • [Assp-test] Alarm mail , status mail anders . westin
  • Re: [Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions K Post

• Earlier messages
• Later messages