>Aah, therein lies the nub of the problem, it does indeed ignore >albumartist - if it just referenced albumartist in favour of artist the >problem would be solved. > Should be easy to fix, by the sound of it.
The artist you are browsing doesn't get displayed, only if the artist is different to the current artist. Therefore, the current artists regular albums would be sorted to the top, as blank artist name would come first? >At the time the list is compiled the code >could test for and use albumartist as first point of reference, if no >albumartist entry, use artist. I'm curious though, if there are >multiple artist (or albumartist) entries for an album, which entry does >LMS pick for the lineup? > It should show a comma separated list of all artists, so sort by that. I think this works well enough. Would potentially be icing on the cake if the artists were listed in the order they were tagged on tracks, but they probably get displayed in contributor id order, which is random, or contributor name order. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
