On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:11:25 -0700, Eric Niebler wrote > Jeff Garland wrote: > > Funny, I've never liked links that change color when visited. Half- > way through reading a heavily cross-linked reference, the multi- > colored links look messy and distracting IMO. But I'm willing to be > convinced otherwise. If people want this, the CSS is simple enough:
It isn't just me on this one. Some well repected useability experts put it on the top ten list of mistakes in web design -- see #3. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html > > Those #includes still really stand out -- after pondering the christmas tree > > comment I wonder whether these deserve any special coloring? I can't think of > > a reason that they do. > > How about now? I'm using a dark purple. That's better -- pretty much fades in now... > > The contrast is too much for my taste and that setup probably won't > > ...snip... > > I have to say I totally agree. How about now? I've switched to using > a slightly darker grey for the header, and blue for the text. I also > used a slightly larger font for the table title so it stands out > against the header. I'm happy with the result. Excellent. I like how the table headers match the other header color -- nice for consistency. And the header is distinct but not overwhelming. Great stuff -- some might even say 'im'-pressive ;-) Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
