Jeff Garland wrote:
One thing about the link color that is a problem is that navigated links are the same color. I really like having a different color for navigated links because it makes it obvious I've already been somewhere. I don't have a recommendation on a good color..
Funny, I've never liked links that change color when visited. Half-way through reading a heavily cross-linked reference, the multi-colored links look messy and distracting IMO. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. If people want this, the CSS is simple enough:
a:visited
{
color: #9c5a9c;
}This turns visited links purple-ish.
Those #includes still really stand out -- after pondering the christmas tree comment I wonder whether these deserve any special coloring? I can't think of a reason that they do.
How about now? I'm using a dark purple.
The contrast is too much for my taste and that setup probably won't work well for printing. From me, the table title get's overwhelmed by the header. I'm afraid I just don't like the inverted text approach to the table heading -- it requires a large color contrast with the contrasting color not being the point of focus.
I have to say I totally agree. How about now? I've switched to using a slightly darker grey for the header, and blue for the text. I also used a slightly larger font for the table title so it stands out against the header. I'm happy with the result.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
