Erik Reuter wrote: > 2. All Members, including Listowners, may express their thoughts on any > subject, including the conduct of other Members. > Why give emphasis to listowners? Why wouldn't "all members" include listowners? The only emphasis should be if we exclude some members. As far as the constitution goes, I think the discussion is healthy, the idea commendable, but I would be in favor of something less rigid. Perhaps a paragraph or two included with the etiquette guidelines that included some of the ideas we've been discussing. Doug email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zo.com/~brighto
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Dan Minette
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Dan Minette
- Re: Brin-L Constitution J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Erik Reuter
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Doug
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Erik Reuter
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Doug
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Erik Reuter
- RESOLUTION (Re: Brin-L Co... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: RESOLUTION (Re: Brin-... Dan Minette
- Compact was: Re: RESOLUTI... Robert Seeberger
- Re: RESOLUTION (Re: Brin-... Erik Reuter
- Re: RESOLUTION (Re: Brin-... Doug
- Re: Brin-L Constitution Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
