Marvin Long, Jr. wrote:
> I'm beginning to sense that we'd all of us like to get on to other things
> and draw our latest list crisis to a close. To that end, I propose that
> we amend the etiquette guidelines by adding part of Erik Reuter's
> reformulation of Jeroen's proposed constitution to the Guidelines (under
> "we further agree that," replacing the last bullet), and then get on with
> our lives. Quoting Erik:
>
>
>>6. No one shall warn, remove, or ban any list Member without an explicit
>>list discussion and group decision, (i) except in the case of urgent,
>>time-critical need such as a large quantity of spam being repeatedly
>>posted. When a Member is unsubscribed without a discussion as allowed in
>>(i) above, the person doing the unsubscribing will immediately post a
>>notice to the list explaining what they have done and why.
>>
>
> Except, because I am an incorrigible tinkerer I would rephrase it
> slightly, yielding:
>
> ---
> No one shall remove or ban (or issue warnings that threaten removal or
> banishment to) any listmember without an explicit list discussion and
> group decision, ETC.
> ---
>
> If we can all agree on that, then I think we should all promise to play
> nice and say a few devotional IAAMOACs and then remind ourselves not to
> reward any perceived slights or misbehavior with more slights and
> misbehavior.
Agree.
>
> Finally, let's all get to reading Kiln People. Chop chop, y'all!!
>
Waiting for my copy to arrive....
--
Doug
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.zo.com/~brighto
"Imagine all the people,
Living for Today"
John Lennon
