In a message dated 7/11/2003 4:34:12 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If you think he was the most dominant pitcher on a > per-game basis you're also wrong, but at least you > have a case and we can talk about it. Arguing that he > was better than Seaver or Clemens is foolish. He > didn't pitch for long enough. He didn't pitch long enough because he pitched in a different era. He was every bit the physical specimen that Clemens is. For 5 years consecutive years he was the best in the game. No one else can make that claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
