I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has issues
with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and moving
the graduation process forward.

Thoughts?

-Steve

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald
<simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, of
> being VP more than Brian LeRoux.
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen <purplecabb...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones.
> > Suggestion:
> > If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 )
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Jesse
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone6
> >
> > On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks <
> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>
> > wrote:
> > >> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for Apache
> > >> Cordova's VP role.
> > >>
> > >> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted the
> > role.
> > >> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and the
> > >> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how long he
> > >> chooses to hold the position.
> > >>
> > >> Michael
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting <
> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while others
> keep
> > >>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign.
> > >>> ...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> See also
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair
> > .
> > >>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.) has no
> > >>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the PMC. The
> > >>>> role is more secretarial in nature.
> > >>>
> > >>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation thing -
> > so
> > >>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired of it
> -
> > a
> > >>> year-long term sounds about right.
> > >>>
> > >>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role long-term
> as
> > >>> well, if they're enjoying it.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Patrick Mueller
> > >>> http://muellerware.org
> > >>>
> >
>

Reply via email to