Alright, sounds good. I am going to move the process forward. If people have any issues, feel free to post here.
-Steve On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for Brian Leroux. > > On 9 October 2012 11:22, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > +1 I agree Brian LeRoux > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > yup, Brian LeRoux > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks > > > <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote: > > > > +1 Brian LeRoux > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP > > > >> > > > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> >I agree! > > > >> >Or if you want a vote: > > > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP > > > >> > > > > >> >Cheers, > > > >> > Jesse > > > >> > > > > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 > > > >> > > > > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one > has > > > >> >>issues > > > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote > and > > > >> >>moving > > > >> >> the graduation process forward. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Thoughts? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> -Steve > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald > > > >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean > > reward, > > > of > > > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald > > > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen > > > >> >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com > > > >> >>>> wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. > > > >> >>>> Suggestion: > > > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 > ) > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Cheers, > > > >> >>>> Jesse > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < > > > >> >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > > > >> >>>> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for > > > Apache > > > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has > > accepted > > > the > > > >> >>>> role. > > > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board > > and > > > the > > > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how > > > long > > > >> >>>>>>he > > > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> Michael > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller < > > > pmue...@gmail.com> > > > >> >>>> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < > > > >> >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com > > > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while > > > others > > > >> >>> keep > > > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. > > > >> >>>>>>> ... > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> See also > > > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair > > > >> >>>> . > > > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair > (V.P.) > > > has > > > >> >>>>>>>>no > > > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the > > PMC. > > > >> >>>>>>>>The > > > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly > rotation > > > >> >>>>>>>thing - > > > >> >>>> so > > > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get > tired > > > of > > > >> >>>>>>>it > > > >> >>> - > > > >> >>>> a > > > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role > > > >> >>>>>>>long-term > > > >> >>> as > > > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> -- > > > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller > > > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org > > > >> >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Timothy Kim >
