yup, Brian LeRoux
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote: > +1 Brian LeRoux > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP >> >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I agree! >> >Or if you want a vote: >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP >> > >> >Cheers, >> > Jesse >> > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 >> > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has >> >>issues >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and >> >>moving >> >> the graduation process forward. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, of >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. >> >>> >> >>> Simon Mac Donald >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen >> >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. >> >>>> Suggestion: >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 ) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Jesse >> >>>> >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> >>>> >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < >> >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for Apache >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted the >> >>>> role. >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and the >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how long >> >>>>>>he >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Michael >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < >> >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while others >> >>> keep >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. >> >>>>>>> ... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> See also >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair >> >>>> . >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.) has >> >>>>>>>>no >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the PMC. >> >>>>>>>>The >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation >> >>>>>>>thing - >> >>>> so >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired of >> >>>>>>>it >> >>> - >> >>>> a >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role >> >>>>>>>long-term >> >>> as >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org >> >>> >> >>
