+1 I agree Brian LeRoux
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > yup, Brian LeRoux > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks > <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote: > > +1 Brian LeRoux > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP > >> > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >I agree! > >> >Or if you want a vote: > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP > >> > > >> >Cheers, > >> > Jesse > >> > > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has > >> >>issues > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and > >> >>moving > >> >> the graduation process forward. > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> >> > >> >> -Steve > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald > >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, > of > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. > >> >>> > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen > >> >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. > >> >>>> Suggestion: > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 ) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Cheers, > >> >>>> Jesse > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < > >> >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for > Apache > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted > the > >> >>>> role. > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and > the > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how > long > >> >>>>>>he > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Michael > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller < > pmue...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < > >> >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while > others > >> >>> keep > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. > >> >>>>>>> ... > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> See also > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair > >> >>>> . > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.) > has > >> >>>>>>>>no > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the PMC. > >> >>>>>>>>The > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation > >> >>>>>>>thing - > >> >>>> so > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired > of > >> >>>>>>>it > >> >>> - > >> >>>> a > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role > >> >>>>>>>long-term > >> >>> as > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> -- > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org > >> >>> > >> > >> >
