Eh this is a nice thread to come home to ----thx for the support everyone. I promise to use these secretarial-in-nature powers for good. In seriousness, this community is a very humbling place to operate in, and its an honor to work w/ you all.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Giorgio Natili <g.nat...@gnstudio.com>wrote: > +1 Brian > > On 10/9/12 8:37 PM, "Tim Kim" <timki...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >+1 for Brian Leroux. > > > >On 9 October 2012 11:22, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > >> +1 I agree Brian LeRoux > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > yup, Brian LeRoux > >> > > >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks > >> > <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote: > >> > > +1 Brian LeRoux > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> >I agree! > >> > >> >Or if you want a vote: > >> > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP > >> > >> > > >> > >> >Cheers, > >> > >> > Jesse > >> > >> > > >> > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > >> > > >> > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one > >>has > >> > >> >>issues > >> > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote > >>and > >> > >> >>moving > >> > >> >> the graduation process forward. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> -Steve > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald > >> > >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean > >> reward, > >> > of > >> > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald > >> > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen > >> > >> >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com > >> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus > >>ones. > >> > >> >>>> Suggestion: > >> > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new > >>+1 ) > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> Cheers, > >> > >> >>>> Jesse > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. > >> > >> >>>>> > >> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < > >> > >> >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for > >> > Apache > >> > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. > >> > >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has > >> accepted > >> > the > >> > >> >>>> role. > >> > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board > >> and > >> > the > >> > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on > >>how > >> > long > >> > >> >>>>>>he > >> > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. > >> > >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>> Michael > >> > >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller < > >> > pmue...@gmail.com> > >> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> > >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < > >> > >> >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com > >> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >> >>>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while > >> > others > >> > >> >>> keep > >> > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. > >> > >> >>>>>>> ... > >> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>>>> See also > >> > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair > >> > >> >>>> . > >> > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair > >>(V.P.) > >> > has > >> > >> >>>>>>>>no > >> > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the > >> PMC. > >> > >> >>>>>>>>The > >> > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. > >> > >> >>>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly > >>rotation > >> > >> >>>>>>>thing - > >> > >> >>>> so > >> > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get > >>tired > >> > of > >> > >> >>>>>>>it > >> > >> >>> - > >> > >> >>>> a > >> > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. > >> > >> >>>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role > >> > >> >>>>>>>long-term > >> > >> >>> as > >> > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. > >> > >> >>>>>>> > >> > >> >>>>>>> -- > >> > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller > >> > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Timothy Kim > > >
