+1 Brian LeRoux On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP > > On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I agree! > >Or if you want a vote: > >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP > > > >Cheers, > > Jesse > > > >Sent from my iPhone6 > > > >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has > >>issues > >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and > >>moving > >> the graduation process forward. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -Steve > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald > >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, of > >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. > >>> > >>> Simon Mac Donald > >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen > >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. > >>>> Suggestion: > >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 ) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Jesse > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >>>> > >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < > >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for Apache > >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted the > >>>> role. > >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and the > >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how long > >>>>>>he > >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Michael > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < > >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while others > >>> keep > >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. > >>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> See also > >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair > >>>> . > >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.) has > >>>>>>>>no > >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the PMC. > >>>>>>>>The > >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation > >>>>>>>thing - > >>>> so > >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired of > >>>>>>>it > >>> - > >>>> a > >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role > >>>>>>>long-term > >>> as > >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller > >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org > >>> > >
