+1 Brian On 10/9/12 8:37 PM, "Tim Kim" <timki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1 for Brian Leroux. > >On 9 October 2012 11:22, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> +1 I agree Brian LeRoux >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > yup, Brian LeRoux >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks >> > <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote: >> > > +1 Brian LeRoux >> > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP >> > >> >> > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >I agree! >> > >> >Or if you want a vote: >> > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP >> > >> > >> > >> >Cheers, >> > >> > Jesse >> > >> > >> > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 >> > >> > >> > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one >>has >> > >> >>issues >> > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote >>and >> > >> >>moving >> > >> >> the graduation process forward. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? >> > >> >> >> > >> >> -Steve >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald >> > >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean >> reward, >> > of >> > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald >> > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen >> > >> >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus >>ones. >> > >> >>>> Suggestion: >> > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new >>+1 ) >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Cheers, >> > >> >>>> Jesse >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < >> > >> >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for >> > Apache >> > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has >> accepted >> > the >> > >> >>>> role. >> > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board >> and >> > the >> > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on >>how >> > long >> > >> >>>>>>he >> > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Michael >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller < >> > pmue...@gmail.com> >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < >> > >> >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com >> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while >> > others >> > >> >>> keep >> > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. >> > >> >>>>>>> ... >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> See also >> > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair >> > >> >>>> . >> > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair >>(V.P.) >> > has >> > >> >>>>>>>>no >> > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the >> PMC. >> > >> >>>>>>>>The >> > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly >>rotation >> > >> >>>>>>>thing - >> > >> >>>> so >> > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get >>tired >> > of >> > >> >>>>>>>it >> > >> >>> - >> > >> >>>> a >> > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role >> > >> >>>>>>>long-term >> > >> >>> as >> > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> -- >> > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller >> > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org >> > >> >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > >-- >Timothy Kim
