+1 for Brian
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alright, sounds good. I am going to move the process forward. If people > have any issues, feel free to post here. > > -Steve > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for Brian Leroux. >> >> On 9 October 2012 11:22, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> > +1 I agree Brian LeRoux >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > yup, Brian LeRoux >> > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks >> > > <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote: >> > > > +1 Brian LeRoux >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP >> > > >> >> > > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> >I agree! >> > > >> >Or if you want a vote: >> > > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Cheers, >> > > >> > Jesse >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > >> > >> > > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one >> has >> > > >> >>issues >> > > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote >> and >> > > >> >>moving >> > > >> >> the graduation process forward. >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Thoughts? >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> -Steve >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald >> > > >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean >> > reward, >> > > of >> > > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald >> > > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen >> > > >> >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com >> > > >> >>>> wrote: >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. >> > > >> >>>> Suggestion: >> > > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 >> ) >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> Cheers, >> > > >> >>>> Jesse >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. >> > > >> >>>>> >> > > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < >> > > >> >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> > > >> >>>> wrote: >> > > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for >> > > Apache >> > > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has >> > accepted >> > > the >> > > >> >>>> role. >> > > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board >> > and >> > > the >> > > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how >> > > long >> > > >> >>>>>>he >> > > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> Michael >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller < >> > > pmue...@gmail.com> >> > > >> >>>> wrote: >> > > >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < >> > > >> >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com >> > > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while >> > > others >> > > >> >>> keep >> > > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. >> > > >> >>>>>>> ... >> > > >> >>>>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>>>> See also >> > > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair >> > > >> >>>> . >> > > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair >> (V.P.) >> > > has >> > > >> >>>>>>>>no >> > > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the >> > PMC. >> > > >> >>>>>>>>The >> > > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. >> > > >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly >> rotation >> > > >> >>>>>>>thing - >> > > >> >>>> so >> > > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get >> tired >> > > of >> > > >> >>>>>>>it >> > > >> >>> - >> > > >> >>>> a >> > > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. >> > > >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role >> > > >> >>>>>>>long-term >> > > >> >>> as >> > > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. >> > > >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >>>>>>> -- >> > > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller >> > > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Timothy Kim >>
