+1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I agree! >Or if you want a vote: >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP > >Cheers, > Jesse > >Sent from my iPhone6 > >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has >>issues >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and >>moving >> the graduation process forward. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Steve >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, of >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. >>> >>> Simon Mac Donald >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen >>><purplecabb...@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. >>>> Suggestion: >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 ) >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jesse >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >>>> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < >>> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for Apache >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted the >>>> role. >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and the >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how long >>>>>>he >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < >>> jukka.zitt...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while others >>> keep >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See also >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair >>>> . >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.) has >>>>>>>>no >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the PMC. >>>>>>>>The >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation >>>>>>>thing - >>>> so >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired of >>>>>>>it >>> - >>>> a >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role >>>>>>>long-term >>> as >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org >>>
