On Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>This is nonsense because historically, the Republicans have spent more than
>the Democrats. Look at the monster deficits Reagan ran up -- and he would
>have spent more if the Democrats in Congress hadn't stopped
>him.
>
Please point me to any reliable source that would back this up(not CNN and not an
editorial, real numbers). Didn't we have a Democrat majority back then?
>If Gore were president, we probably would have had much what we had under
>Clinton -- smaller government, less spending, better economy.
>
This is so laughable it doesn't deserve comment.
>for the first time since Ike. And Gore is more naturally conservative
>fiscally than Clinton.
>
More laughs!
>And I don't see nobody handing me thousands of dollars, etc.
>
Assuming you make what a typical programmer does, and the Democrats don't screw it up,
you should save thousands per year, increasing over the next ten years. Please
calculate your savings and send it back to the feds if you don't like it. Just don't
force me and everyone else to do the same.
I'm not sure if this is accurate but check out
http://www.heritage.org/taxcalculator
Lee
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists