yes. Investigation not litigation at this point, as the Democratic
candidate has conceded. Therefore it doesn't matter who won the vote
But I think we need more safeguards than this in the next election.
Also, Bernalillo County here is a poster child for why the strategy of
requesting an absentee ballot to create a paper trail does not work

Dana


On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:07:49 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it deserves investigation though given that I've heard the CEO
> of the company responsible for the software was a Bush campaign
> donor.
> 
> Further, the DNC would've had its own pollsters and I'm sure they
> would've been careful not skew the results.
> 
> I'd say the data warrants investigation.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:32:27 -0500, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Like Tom Brokow said the other night. The exit polls were clearly weighted
> > for known democratic precincts.
> >
> > Of course the CNN Exit polls are fairly consistent with the actual results.
> >
> > If I stood at a precinct and asked three people with Kerry buttons on who
> > they voted for as they left, I think my results may have been fairly skewed
> > too.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:08 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Voter Fraud? Why are the exit polls so wrong in Florida?
> >
> > -------------------
> > Published on Thursday, November 4, 2004 by CommonDreams.org/
> >
> > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1104-38.htm
> >
> > *The Ultimate Felony Against Democracy
> > by Thom Hartmann*
> >
> > The hot story in the Blogosphere is that the "erroneous" exit polls
> > that showed Kerry carrying Florida and Ohio (among other states) weren't
> > erroneous at all <http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=388> - it was the
> > numbers produced by paperless voting machines that were wrong, and Kerry
> > actually won. As more and more analysis is done of what may (or may not)
> > be the most massive election fraud in the history of the world, however,
> > it's critical that we keep the largest issue at the forefront at all
> > time: /Why are We The People allowing private, for-profit corporations,
> > answerable only to their officers and boards of directors, and loyal
> > only to agendas and politicians that will enhance their profitability,
> > to handle our votes?/
> >
> > Maybe Florida went for Kerry, maybe for Bush. Over time - and through
> > the efforts of some very motivated investigative reporters - we may well
> > find out (Bev Harris of www.blackboxvoting.org
> > <http://www.blackboxvoting.org> just filed what may be the largest
> > Freedom of Information Act [FOIA} filing in history), and bloggers and
> > investigative reporters are discovering an odd discrepancy in exit polls
> > being largely accurate in paper-ballot states and oddly inaccurate in
> > touch-screen electronic voting states Even raw voter analyses
> > <http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/3/52213/1921> are showing extreme
> > oddities in touch-screen-run Florida, and eagle-eyed bloggers are
> > finding that news organizations are retroactively altering their exit
> > polls <http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/04/11/ana04025.html> to
> > coincide with what the machines ultimately said.
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134526
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to