Eric, 

A good answer might be .... "it is now"  :)


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL injection attack on House of Fusion

 >is <cfqueryparam> something a lot of programmers really use?


Only the good ones.  ;)


Thanks,

Eric

David Moore, Jr. wrote:
> When you say "Update Your Code", are you saying using <cfqueryparam>? But
even so, the SQL injection still will use up countless resources instead of
cutting it off early. So, go back and fix 1,000's of lines of code I have
developed over the last 'upteen' years or stop it before it starts? Is this
something new to CF8 or just a necessary evil because of SQL Injection
Attacks. 
>  
> Not trying to pick a fight, becuase I am sure you have forgotten more code
than I will ever know (seriously) and I am probably just being lazy
(seriously), but is <cfqueryparam> something a lot of programmers really
use? I have never seen <cfqueryparam> used on any tags I have purchased or
exchanged and I am afraid all I know is what I have learned from books and
forums. This is the first I have ever heard of using <cfqueryparam>.
>  
> ~David G. Moore, Jr.> Subject: Re: SQL injection attack on House of 
> Fusion> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> 
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:01:42 -0400> > > I am currently using the 
> SQLprev.cfm from Jochem to stop the onslaught of superfluous bandwidth 
> suckage from my server, but was wondering what the difference would be 
> with this one. I am not looking to start a "my SQL Injection blocker 
> is better than yours", yet trying to educate myself on just what is 
> going on and what is best to do. > > My original SQLprev script 
> (http://www.gravityfree.com/_sqlprev.cfm.txt) > just checks for basic 
> SQL keywords with a semicolon in URL variables. > It's a quick and 
> dirty way to give you some protection from bots > short-term while 
> your code base is updated to use best practices and > secure coding 
> methods. Mary Jo's is more thorough in that it checks > additional 
> variable scopes, and can help protect better against > hand-drafted 
> attacks, but may have a higher p
otential for false > positives (though it's improved recently from what I
can tell).> > SQLPrev has a version compatible with CF5 for those who need
it where > the other script relies on CFMX functions to run. I'm not saying
one is > better than the other, they both get the job done. Just use
whatever > works best for you, and update your code so that you don't need
either > of them <g>.> > > -Justin Scott> > > > 
> 
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:311331
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to