-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The problem with webmin though is that while the graphical interface is
convenient, you STILL need to know what you are doing with the
underlying server.  With samba, if you enter something for the directory
mask and get this wrong, you'll either not be able to access your
shares, or the security will be too open.  But this is a Samba problem,
not a webmin problem.

So, after you go through the trouble of learning how to deal with your
service, you quickly find webmin more gets in your way than helps you.
THe time it takes to open a browser, navigate to webmin, login, make the
changes, save the changes - this adds a delay.  If you understand your
service that well, it's so much faster to just edit the text file in
question, without the network lag of a web browser.

And if you end up editing the config files directly because you now know
enough to do so, then why do you need webmin?? :)

I'm not saying "don't use webmin", but showing that webmin is but a
stepping stone in the path of server knowledge.

On the other hand, seeing as webmin allows direct configuration of your
servers, you need to take precautions to ensure it is not accessible to
unauthorized folks.  It should never be made accessible outside the
local network - unless you know what your doing with the security side
of it.  Just a thought.

Shawn


Jon wrote:
> That's the rub, yes. Webmin modules simply put a nice HTML GUI into the 
> various servers installed on a system. While it can apt-get (or yum) for 
> you, in general it's not going to configure a server for you. The 
> knowledge about how various apps should be configured still lies with 
> the user.
> 
> One thing that I do like GUIs for is that they frequently expose options 
> that are otherwise unapparent. The Samba webmin module is a good example 
> of a nice module that presents all of the 'obvious' Samba functionality 
> (like Unix/Samba user sync, for example) right in your face. It's good 
> for quick start stuff.
> 
> J

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFnBG82B6Swl9qN24RAnhfAKC7HaSWcnrbIKk2fK/5WTsHrluDrACeKAvN
eZ1sM93Oc4fix3OXLK6bJI4=
=6zvZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to