well, that's some thinking-outside-the-box stuff, right there!
thank you Alex!

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 2:35 PM Alexandra Deis-Lauby <
[email protected]> wrote:

> The last time I danced one of these, I learned that if you promenade with
> the Robins passing right shoulder, this flows very well.  So if one MUST
> call it, you might change the promenade direction.
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2024, at 3:32 PM, Elizabeth Bloom Albert via Contra Callers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Please, pretty please, with sugar on top!
> Please don’t call (or write) any more dances where a Half-Promenade
> (across the set) is followed by a Circle to the Left! With the possible
> exception of interlocking long wavy lines-- another big ugh! in my book,
> there is nothing more jarring than the 1/2 Prom to a Circle Left combo
> I once attended an (out-of-town) dance where three dances were called that
> had that combo (three!) and in spite of all the (other) pretty good dances
> and excellent dance partners, this is what I remember about that experience
> to this day!
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:29 AM Julian Blechner via Contra Callers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> My biggest nono is "too much clockwise". If moves are awkward or with meh
>> flow, that's not a health or safety thing. Whereas getting dizzy is.
>>
>> In dance,
>> Julian Blechner
>> He/him
>> Western Mass
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 8:40 AM Angela DeCarlis via Contra Callers <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Surprised no one's mentioned interlocking long wavy lines, yet — I think
>>> it's relatively well-known that Lisa Greenleaf hates this move! Can't say
>>> I'm a huge fan, either, but it has its moments.
>>>
>>> For my two-cents, butterfly whirls are on thin ice! I'll program dances
>>> that include this figure with a partner on rare occasion, and symmetrical
>>> dances with both a partner and neighbor whirl could be novel enough to be
>>> okay (???) on a cold day, but I think I would essentially never call a
>>> dance with only a neighbor butterfly whirl.
>>>
>>> There are too many excellent dances to ever bother with the mediocre
>>> ones, honestly.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 3:14 AM Neal Schlein via Contra Callers <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with Jonathan about your existing list, and think that almost
>>>> any sequence CAN be used if done with knowledgeable intent.
>>>>
>>>> However, for the general list of things to avoid I would nominate what
>>>> I like to call “fudge down the line,” which is any adjustment that a)
>>>> happens solely because the sequence doesn’t fully progress the couples and
>>>> b) does not flow naturally from the existing movement.  (This most often
>>>> happens in Beckett dances or those substantially in Beckett formation;
>>>> examples include a 2 count sideways slide along the line or a slightly
>>>> angled right and left thru.)
>>>>
>>>> Notably, the 4 beat slide in “With Thanks to the Dean” and similar
>>>> dances would not count because they are full and discrete actions that
>>>> are specifically accounted for in the flow and timing.
>>>>
>>>> Neal Schlein
>>>> Librarian, MSLIS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:28 PM Michael Fuerst via Contra Callers <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Depending on the flow of the dance,  balance and box the gnat  can
>>>>> often replace  dsd and shoulder rounds 1 1/2
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:17 PM Maia McCormick via Contra Callers <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have Bob's list handy, but I cribbed heavily from it to make this
>>>>>> (much less extensive) list of figures + timings
>>>>>> <https://contra.maiamccormick.com/assets/pdfs/esc-choreo-figures.pdf>,
>>>>>> in case it's useful to anyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (This reminds me of some more things I don't like, ha. Circle L and
>>>>>> pass through to swing -- IME the swing always gets truncated. Dosido 1.5x
>>>>>> and right shoulder round 1.5x don't quiiite fit in 8 counts of music and
>>>>>> are often frustrating. And I don't call couples' dosidos anymore, 
>>>>>> they're a
>>>>>> pain to execute correctly unless everyone in the hall is EXTREMELY on top
>>>>>> of it.)
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Maia McCormick (she/her)
>>>>>> 917.279.8194
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:02 AM Joe Harrington <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is Bob Isaacs in the house?  He has a giant spreadsheet with every
>>>>>>> possible move transition and a count of the number of times it occurs 
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> set of dances that now numbers in the hundreds or maybe a lot more.  
>>>>>>> It’s
>>>>>>> interesting which unlikely combinations do occur and which rarely do.  I
>>>>>>> hope this someday sees the light of day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> —jh—
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:29 PM Maia McCormick via Contra Callers <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeff, impressively bad, well done!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My biggest pet peeve is a RH chain (or promenade, or other move
>>>>>>>> with a CCW courtesy turn) into a circle L—though this is a very
>>>>>>>> of-the-moment style preference, as I know plenty of the classic dances 
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> this combo. (Likewise for dances where just the 1s do a figure while 
>>>>>>>> the 2s
>>>>>>>> stand around, doubly so if the dance doesn’t alternate active couples.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Long lines followed by a chain is quite idiomatic—and probably in
>>>>>>>> part because of the strength that idiom, a chain (or other courtesy 
>>>>>>>> turn
>>>>>>>> figure) followed by long lines drives me up a wall.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don’t love long lines into a circle—I’ll tolerate it if the rest
>>>>>>>> of the dance is really exceptional, ehhhh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Maia McCormick (she/her)
>>>>>>>> 917.279.8194
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:31 PM Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Balance neighbor (4), swing partner (12)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ones dosido below while twos seesaw above (8).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Long lines forward (4), swing on the side (8), long lines back (4).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Circle left 1x (6) pass through (2)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:51 PM Tepfer, Seth via Contra Callers <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    - A right chain INTO a swing
>>>>>>>>>>    - A swing into a circle right
>>>>>>>>>>    - Standard right shoulder hey into a swing
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Plenty other bad flow examples
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seth Tepfer, MBA, CSM, PMP (he, him, his)
>>>>>>>>>> Senior IT Manager, Emory Primate Center
>>>>>>>>>> <Outlook-b31euhoh.png>
>>>>>>>>>> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/[email protected]?anonymous&ep=signature>
>>>>>>>>>>  Book
>>>>>>>>>> time to meet with me
>>>>>>>>>> <https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/[email protected]/bookings/>
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 5, 2024 9:48 PM
>>>>>>>>>> *To:* New Contra Callers List <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* [External] [Callers] Re: Choreographic No-Nos
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't agree with your list.  Yes, swings on the first half of a
>>>>>>>>>> phrase are challenging and I might try to avoid them.  There are 
>>>>>>>>>> dances
>>>>>>>>>> with this that generally work fine, especially if the caller is 
>>>>>>>>>> aware of
>>>>>>>>>> the potential issue and teaches and calls accordingly.  The do-si-do 
>>>>>>>>>> across
>>>>>>>>>> can be a bit awkward in a crowded line, but only if everyone is 
>>>>>>>>>> doing the
>>>>>>>>>> do-si-do.  If only the 1's or 2's are doing it then there is no 
>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>> Shadow swings seem to be a personal preference or dislike and not 
>>>>>>>>>> really a
>>>>>>>>>> choreographic issue.  I actually think that a right chain after a 
>>>>>>>>>> swing can
>>>>>>>>>> work very well.  If you end the swing with the pointy hands pointing 
>>>>>>>>>> across
>>>>>>>>>> then the right hands of the right hand dancers are right there ready 
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> pull by.  I suppose you might say there is a momentum change, but 
>>>>>>>>>> that can
>>>>>>>>>> be very welcome in a dance where everything seems to be traveling 
>>>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>>>> way.  Not every dance has to have continuous motion in the same 
>>>>>>>>>> direction
>>>>>>>>>> all the time.  I danced a dance with that set of figures just last 
>>>>>>>>>> Friday
>>>>>>>>>> and I was thinking to myself how well it seemed to work.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I see #1 and #3 as more of a challenge than a problem.  #4 is
>>>>>>>>>> a personal preference and #2 seems like a perfectly fine transition 
>>>>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>>>> figures.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/5/2024 7:37 PM, Michael Fuerst via Contra Callers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > I am accumulating a  list of figures, or figure sequence that
>>>>>>>>>> significant dance writers (not necessarily a majority) consider
>>>>>>>>>> Choreographic No-Nos
>>>>>>>>>> > My list so far:
>>>>>>>>>> > 1. do-si-do across
>>>>>>>>>> > 2. right chain after a swing
>>>>>>>>>> > 3 short swings on an odd phrase
>>>>>>>>>> > 4. Shadow swings
>>>>>>>>>> > Does anyone have further suggestions?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Contra Callers mailing list --
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Contra Callers mailing list --
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Contra Callers mailing list --
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
> --
>
> * Elizabeth Bloom Albert *
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
>

-- 

* Elizabeth Bloom Albert *
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to