On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote: > At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed > RAW > file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the > exposure > back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results are quite different, and > seem > to show that dt is losing some of the high intensity pixels. > > (I said 'seem to'. Please don't pile into me!) > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/se9yawlsbl7zpff/darktable.jpg?dl=0 > (darktable) > https://www.dropbox.com/s/0cepsk7i54v4x72/Lightroom.jpg?dl=0 > (Lightroom) > https://www.dropbox.com/s/mrg997wamwg6yj6/Y5050211.ORF?dl=0 (.orf) > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > _______ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@lists.darkta > ble.org >
Well, did they look the same before reducing exposure? I wonder if basecurve is the same in both cases (two options are available in DT). Looks like LR does some sort of highlight reconstruction by default, if you enable LCh reconstruction in DT you will get same amount of details but different color cast... ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
