Peter, Thank you and Chris for providing the images and the question. I learned a lot about highlight reconstruction and color reconstruction just playing with these two images.
Bill On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Peter Cripps <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Bill, thats much better than I've been able to achieve with dt. I > clearly need to spend time learning how to use the highlight reconstruction > module! > > Before posting the inevitable Lightroom comparison, let me say that I > really don't like using that software. I have a long list of complaints, > most of which are well addressed by darktable. I've been using darktable on > my home linux machine for quite some time, and have been pleased with the > results. > > Then along came the windows version of dt. Great, I thought, I can now use > the same image processing software on my windows laptop and my linux > desktop. And so it was. But of course it was now all too easy to compare > results on my laptop between the two programs. It was then that I started > to notice that Lightroom does do a better job of highlight recovery than > darktable. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/1o1q6xpj6pba2s7/Lightroom_final.jpg?dl=0 > > As I've mentioned before, I'm very conscious of the fact that dt is a gift > from the developers, who obviously take a lot of pride in their work. So > this should not be taken as a 'complaint', more a suggestion for > improvements. > > Hope this isn't all TLDR! > > Peter > > > > On 04/10/2018 07:24 PM, William Ferguson wrote: > > I took another shot at the image with better results this time > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/4fihvmxi0ct9jt6/orf.jpg?dl=0 > > Sidecar is attached. > > Bill > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
