MJ Ray wrote: > and maybe some other bits too (CC3.0 is a long licence). The Scotland > one is far briefer, especially when viewed in context, and it has the > apparently crucial difference of including 'effect or intent'.
I'm actually curious as to why this is apparently crucial; I haven't seen a good explanation of this. It seems to be a better formulation (applies to cases where technology effectively restricts rights by accident, and to cases where it was intended to restrict rights but doesn't), but I'm not sure why it's crucial. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it. So why isn't he in prison yet?... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
