MJ Ray wrote: > Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003876.html > [...] >> The main motivation was to prevent license complication, >> *not* to prohibit parallel distribution. >> This is emphasized quite clearly in that message. > > If they wanted to "prevent license complication" why didn't they base > CC3.0 on CC-Scotland's plain and simple English that already allows > parallel distribution, rather than the CC2.5-generic that IIRC doesn't?
'Cause they're not that bright. ;-) Basing 3.0 on CC-Scotland probably seemed "too radical" and basing it on CC2.5-generic seemed more "conservative". People make stupid decisions like that. Most of them probably never even read CC-Scotland, despite our suggestions. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it. So why isn't he in prison yet?... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
