On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:06:13 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > OTOH, if CC intends that this clause prevents ever making the Work > > available on TPM-encumbered media (which I don't think is the > > plain-text reading of this clause), I don't believe it's > > DFSG-compliant. > AFAICT, CC seems to interpret the clause this way, since the explicit > parallel distribution proviso was *removed* because of strong opposition > from many people at a CC summit... AFAICT, you're speculating based on the same limited information that I have at my disposal. There are many reasons someone might object to such a clause that *don't* contradict our goals, and I want to hear CC's own answer to this question. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
