MJ Ray wrote:

> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Where's the cc-nl lead's explanation?  It's something.
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003876.html
> Hope that helps,

It really does help a lot.

"in any case i do not think (and that judgment was  
shared by a number of other project leads) that these fringe  
scenarios are a good reason to make the licenses more complicated"

The main motivation was to prevent license complication,
*not* to prohibit parallel distribution.
This is emphasized quite clearly in that message.

Therefore I conclude that we can interpret that CC3.0 draft
means what it says and parallel distribution is OK.

Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...

with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to