On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:37:08 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:06:13 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > OTOH, if CC intends that this clause prevents ever making the Work
> > > available on TPM-encumbered media (which I don't think is the
> > > plain-text reading of this clause), I don't believe it's
> > > DFSG-compliant.
> > AFAICT, CC seems to interpret the clause this way, since the
> > explicit parallel distribution proviso was *removed* because of
> > strong opposition from many people at a CC summit...
> AFAICT, you're speculating based on the same limited information that
> I have at my disposal.

Yes, I admit I am.

> There are many reasons someone might object to
> such a clause that *don't* contradict our goals, and I want to hear
> CC's own answer to this question.

I would be interested too.
Has anyone from the Debian Creative Commons Workgroup already asked for
a clarification?

But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend.   -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpUdklF1k22k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to