Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003876.html [...] > The main motivation was to prevent license complication, > *not* to prohibit parallel distribution. > This is emphasized quite clearly in that message.
If they wanted to "prevent license complication" why didn't they base CC3.0 on CC-Scotland's plain and simple English that already allows parallel distribution, rather than the CC2.5-generic that IIRC doesn't? Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
