As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever recreate the mirror.
I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done now than later. Robbie On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 > > > > If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from > git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis > > > > It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that > would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would > restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on > github. > > > Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these > discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been > hearing the PR comments). > > > So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? > > > I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
