As Geofrey said on the infra JIRA: " Just waiting on Github to do their daily scrape of git.apache.org"
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Thiago Kronig <[email protected]> wrote: > 404: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/ > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:18 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> too late :) >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to >> > chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. >> > >> > When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus >> > months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to >> > happen *right now* :) >> > >> > Robbie >> > >> > On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go >> >> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has >> >>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever >> >>> recreate the mirror. >> >>> >> >>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an >> >>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and >> >>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain >> >>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old >> >>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates >> >>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or >> >>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish >> >>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA >> >>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). >> >>> >> >>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub >> >>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so >> >>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. >> >>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done >> >>> now than later. >> >>> >> >>> Robbie >> >>> >> >>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from >> >>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git >> >>>> >> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that >> >>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would >> >>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on >> >>>> github. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these >> >>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been >> >>>> hearing the PR comments). >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Clebert Suconic >> >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >> >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >> -- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
