too late :) On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to > chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. > > When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus > months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to > happen *right now* :) > > Robbie > > On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go >> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has >>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever >>> recreate the mirror. >>> >>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an >>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and >>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain >>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old >>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates >>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or >>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish >>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA >>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). >>> >>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub >>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so >>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. >>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done >>> now than later. >>> >>> Robbie >>> >>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from >>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that >>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would >>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on >>>> github. >>>> >>>> >>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these >>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been >>>> hearing the PR comments). >>>> >>>> >>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? >>>> >>>> >>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
-- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
