404: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:18 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > too late :) > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to > > chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. > > > > When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus > > months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to > > happen *right now* :) > > > > Robbie > > > > On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go > >> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has > >>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever > >>> recreate the mirror. > >>> > >>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an > >>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and > >>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain > >>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old > >>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates > >>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or > >>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish > >>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA > >>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). > >>> > >>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub > >>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so > >>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. > >>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done > >>> now than later. > >>> > >>> Robbie > >>> > >>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from > >>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that > >>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would > >>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on > >>>> github. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these > >>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been > >>>> hearing the PR comments). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Clebert Suconic > >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] > >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >
