Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis. Robbie
On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is > mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf > mirror. > > It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of > Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org > still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror, > which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does > too. > > I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the > mirrors again, I'll ask and see. > > On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >> too late :) >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to >>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. >>> >>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus >>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to >>> happen *right now* :) >>> >>> Robbie >>> >>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go >>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has >>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever >>>>> recreate the mirror. >>>>> >>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an >>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and >>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain >>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old >>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates >>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or >>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish >>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA >>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). >>>>> >>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub >>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so >>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. >>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done >>>>> now than later. >>>>> >>>>> Robbie >>>>> >>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from >>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that >>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would >>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on >>>>>> github. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these >>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been >>>>>> hearing the PR comments). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
