Infra (short for infra-structure) is a team at apache that handles things like JIRA, git integration... etc
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Mark Frazier <[email protected]> wrote: > Robbie, I’m still rather new to Apache and the open source community, so I’m > a little confused. > > When you say “Infra”, what exactly are you referring to? Is this a part of > the Apache team? > > Thanks > >> On May 22, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis. >> >> Robbie >> >> On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is >>> mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf >>> mirror. >>> >>> It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of >>> Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org >>> still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror, >>> which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does >>> too. >>> >>> I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the >>> mirrors again, I'll ask and see. >>> >>> On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> too late :) >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to >>>>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. >>>>> >>>>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus >>>>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to >>>>> happen *right now* :) >>>>> >>>>> Robbie >>>>> >>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go >>>>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has >>>>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever >>>>>>> recreate the mirror. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an >>>>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and >>>>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain >>>>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old >>>>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates >>>>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or >>>>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish >>>>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA >>>>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub >>>>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so >>>>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. >>>>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done >>>>>>> now than later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Robbie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from >>>>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that >>>>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would >>>>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on >>>>>>>> github. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these >>>>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been >>>>>>>> hearing the PR comments). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com > -- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
