Okay. Thanks! On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:55 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
> As Geofrey said on the infra JIRA: > > " Just waiting on Github to do their daily scrape of git.apache.org" > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Thiago Kronig <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 404: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/ > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:18 PM Clebert Suconic < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> too late :) > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to > >> > chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. > >> > > >> > When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus > >> > months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to > >> > happen *right now* :) > >> > > >> > Robbie > >> > > >> > On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go > >> >> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has > >> >>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever > >> >>> recreate the mirror. > >> >>> > >> >>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big > an > >> >>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and > >> >>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain > >> >>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old > >> >>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates > >> >>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference > or > >> >>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish > >> >>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA > >> >>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). > >> >>> > >> >>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current > GitHub > >> >>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so > >> >>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo > again. > >> >>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better > done > >> >>> now than later. > >> >>> > >> >>> Robbie > >> >>> > >> >>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> >>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from > >> >>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git > >> >>>> > >> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do > that > >> >>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would > >> >>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on > >> >>>> github. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these > >> >>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has > been > >> >>>> hearing the PR comments). > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Clebert Suconic > >> >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] > >> >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Clebert Suconic > >> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] > >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com > >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >
