The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf mirror.
It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror, which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does too. I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the mirrors again, I'll ask and see. On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > too late :) > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell > <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to >> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. >> >> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus >> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to >> happen *right now* :) >> >> Robbie >> >> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go >>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. >>> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell >>> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has >>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever >>>> recreate the mirror. >>>> >>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an >>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and >>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain >>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old >>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates >>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or >>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish >>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA >>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). >>>> >>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub >>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so >>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. >>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done >>>> now than later. >>>> >>>> Robbie >>>> >>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from >>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that >>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would >>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on >>>>> github. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these >>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been >>>>> hearing the PR comments). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suco...@jboss.com >>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suco...@jboss.com > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
